5 questions, one for each idea where we can. Answer them, then see which ideas to fix.
Question 1 of 5
Ecologists want to compare the species diversity of the plant communities in two meadows by calculating Simpson's Diversity Index for each. Which procedure is most appropriate?
Answer and reasoning
AList the different plant species found in each meadow, without counting the individuals of each. A student who thinks diversity is just the number of species picks this. A species list gives the number of species but not their relative abundance, which a diversity index also needs.
BCount the total number of plants in each meadow, without recording which species each belongs to. A student who thinks diversity depends on the number of individuals picks this. A total count without species identities gives neither the number of species nor their relative abundance.
CCount the individuals of each species in several randomly placed quadrats of equal size in each meadow.Correct Species diversity depends on both the number of species and their relative abundance, so the individuals of each species must be counted (n and N for Simpson's Diversity Index). Several randomly placed quadrats of the same size in each meadow give a representative sample and a fair comparison.
DCount the individuals of each species in one quadrat placed in the middle of each meadow. A student who thinks one sample represents a whole meadow picks this. A single quadrat in one place may miss species and does not show how much counts vary; several randomly placed quadrats are needed.
The diagram shows four groupings of the living and nonliving parts of a pond; each box includes everything in the boxes inside it. Which box represents the pond's community?
Answer and reasoning
ABox YCorrect A community is all the interacting populations of different species in an area. Box Y includes the populations of every kind of organism in the pond (fish, frogs, insects, algae, plants, fungi and microorganisms) but none of its nonliving parts.
BBox W A student who confuses a community with a population picks this. Box W contains only one species, the bluegill: it is a population. A community includes the populations of all the species living there.
CBox X A student who thinks a community is made up only of animals picks this. Box X leaves out the algae, plants, fungi and microorganisms, which are also populations in the pond and interact with the animals.
DBox Z A student who includes nonliving parts in the community picks this. Box Z adds the water, sediment and sunlight, so it represents the pond ecosystem; a community includes only the living populations.
The roots of a hypothetical forest tree species are colonized by a fungus. The fungus's threadlike hyphae spread through the soil and take up phosphate, some of which passes to the tree, and some of the sugars that the tree makes in photosynthesis pass to the fungus. What is the original source of the energy that the fungus uses?
Answer and reasoning
AChemical energy in the phosphate and other minerals it takes up from the soil A student who thinks soil minerals are a source of energy picks this. Phosphate supplies matter, such as phosphorus atoms for nucleic acids and phospholipids, but not energy; the fungus's energy comes from the tree's sugars.
BSunlight absorbed by the tree, whose sugars carry that energy to itCorrect Through this interaction the fungus gains access to energy it could not obtain alone: the tree captures light energy in photosynthesis and stores it in sugars, some of which pass to the fungus. In return, the fungus increases the tree's access to phosphate, a source of matter, from the soil.
CLight energy captured by the fungus itself in photosynthesis, as plants do A student who thinks fungi are plants picks this. Fungi do not carry out photosynthesis; this fungus obtains sugars, and the energy in them, from the tree.
DEnergy passed back and forth between the fungus and the tree, and so reused A student who thinks energy cycles between organisms picks this. Matter such as phosphate and carbon passes between the partners, but energy is not recycled: it enters as light captured by the tree and is eventually lost as heat.
In the model, each arrow shows the effect of one species' population on another's: + means an increase and − a decrease. Species K lives attached to the body of species L for most of its life. Based on the model, which term best describes the relationship between K and L?
Answer and reasoning
AMutualism, as K and L live in close association A student who thinks every close association (symbiosis) is mutualism picks this. Mutualism requires + effects in both directions, as between L and M in the model; between K and L the effects are + and −.
BCommensalism, as K gains at the expense of L A student who confuses commensalism with parasitism picks this. In commensalism one species benefits and the other is neither helped nor harmed (+ and 0); when one species benefits at the other's expense, the relationship is parasitism or predation.
CParasitism, as K benefits and L is harmedCorrect The model shows a + effect of L on K and a − effect of K on L, so K benefits and L is harmed. Because K lives on the body of L for most of its life and benefits at L's expense, the relationship is parasitism, a symbiosis with + and − effects.
DCompetition, as one of the two species is harmed A student who thinks any interaction in which a species is harmed is competition picks this. Competition harms both species (− and −), as between M and N in the model; here K benefits.
When a competing species is removed from a habitat, the population of the remaining species often increases. Which statement best explains why?
Answer and reasoning
AIndividuals reproduce faster because the species needs to fill the space the competitor left. A student who thinks populations change to meet a need picks this. Individuals do not reproduce faster because the species needs to fill space; the increase comes from greater access to resources.
BFood and other resources are shared among fewer individuals, so births rise or deaths fall.Correct Competing species use some of the same limited resources, such as food or space. With the competitor gone, more of these resources are available to each individual of the remaining species, so its birth rate can rise or its death rate fall, and the population increases.
CThe competitor had been eating the remaining species, so fewer of its individuals now die. A student who confuses competition with predation picks this. Competitors harm each other by using the same limited resources, not by eating each other; the remaining species benefits because more resources are available.
DWith no competitor, the population is no longer limited and would go on growing without end. A student who thinks a population grows without limit once a competitor is removed picks this. Other factors, such as the total amount of food and space, predators and disease, still limit the population, so it levels off at a new size.
In preparation: 0 of 5 sections compiled and reviewed. The rest show key terms and common mistakes from our question bank until they are.
8.5.A.1 Species composition Fix
Species composition
The identity of the species that make up a community, that is, which species are present.
Species diversity
A measure of community structure that takes into account both the number of species in a community (species richness) and how evenly the individuals are distributed among those species (relative abundance).
Species richness
The number of different species in a community. It is one component of diversity; it does not show how many individuals belong to each species.
Relative abundance
The proportion of all the individuals in a community that belong to a particular species (n/N).
Simpson's Diversity Index
Diversity Index = 1 − Σ(n/N)², where n is the total number of organisms of a particular species and N the total number of organisms of all species. It is 0 when only one species is present and approaches 1 as the number of species rises and individuals are spread more evenly among them; a higher value means higher diversity.
Quadrat sampling
Counting the organisms of each species inside frames of a fixed area placed at random in a habitat. Several quadrats are needed to give a representative estimate of the community's composition and diversity.
Students often think The community with more species is always the more diverse, whatever the numbers of individuals of each species. In fact No. The number of species (richness) is one part of diversity; diversity also depends on how evenly the individuals are spread among the species. A community dominated by one species can be less diverse than one with fewer, evenly represented species.
Students often think The value of Σ(n/N)² is itself the diversity index, so a larger Σ(n/N)² means a more diverse community. In fact No. Σ(n/N)² is the probability that two individuals picked at random belong to the same species, so a large value means low diversity. Simpson's Diversity Index is 1 − Σ(n/N)².
8.5.B.1 Community Fix
Community
All the populations of different species that live and interact in an area at the same time. A community includes only living organisms; together with the nonliving parts of the area it forms an ecosystem.
Population
All the individuals of one species living in an area at the same time.
Students often think A community is a group of organisms of one kind living together, the same as a population. In fact No. A population is all the individuals of one species in an area; a community is all the populations of different species that live and interact there.
Students often think A community is made up of the animals living in an area; plants and microorganisms are part of the surroundings. In fact No. A community includes the populations of all species in an area: plants, algae, fungi and microorganisms as well as animals.
8.5.B.2 Interactions and access to energy and matter Fix
Interactions and access to energy and matter
The ways populations obtain energy and matter depend on their interactions: for example, predators and parasites obtain energy and matter from their prey or hosts, mutualists exchange resources, and competitors reduce one another's share of a limited resource.
Students often think Plants and fungi get their energy from the minerals or nutrients they absorb from the soil. In fact No. Minerals such as phosphate and nitrate supply matter (atoms such as phosphorus and nitrogen) but not usable energy for plants or fungi. The energy in a plant comes from light captured in photosynthesis, and a fungus gets its energy from organic molecules such as sugars.
Students often think Fungi are plants, so they make their own sugars by photosynthesis. In fact No. Fungi do not photosynthesize. They obtain energy and carbon from organic molecules made by other organisms, by decomposing dead material or through interactions such as mutualism and parasitism.
8.5.B.3 Positive and negative effects Fix
Positive and negative effects
The effect of one population on another, recorded as + (increases the other population), − (decreases it) or 0 (no effect). Pairs of effects characterize interactions: predation and parasitism +/−, competition −/−, mutualism +/+, commensalism +/0.
Predator/prey interaction
An interaction in which one population (the predator) kills and eats individuals of another (the prey): + for the predator, − for the prey. Predator and prey populations often rise and fall in cycles, with predator peaks following prey peaks.
Cooperation
An interaction in which individuals or populations act together in ways that benefit both, as in mutualism.
Trophic cascade
A chain of effects that passes down a food chain from a change at a higher trophic level. For example, removing a top predator increases its prey, which then reduces the organisms that prey eats, which increases the next level down.
Niche partitioning
The division of resources, such as food, space or time of activity, among species that would otherwise compete, so that their use of resources overlaps less. It reduces competition and can allow similar species to coexist.
Students often think Species that live in close association (in symbiosis) always benefit each other. In fact No. Symbiosis is any close, long-term interaction between two species; it includes mutualism (+/+), commensalism (+/0) and parasitism (+/−).
Students often think In commensalism, one species benefits by taking something from the other, which is harmed. In fact No. In commensalism one species benefits and the other is neither helped nor harmed (+/0). When one species benefits at the other's expense, the relationship is parasitism or predation (+/−).
8.5.B.4 Competition Fix
Competition
An interaction in which populations use the same limited resource, such as food, water, light or space, so that each reduces the other's growth or survival (−/−).
Symbiosis
A close, long-term interaction between individuals of two different species. Symbioses include parasitism, mutualism and commensalism.
Parasitism
A symbiosis in which one species, the parasite, lives on or in the other, the host, and benefits at the host's expense (+/−).
Mutualism
A symbiosis in which both species benefit (+/+), for example a fungus that supplies a plant's roots with minerals and receives sugars from the plant.
Commensalism
A symbiosis in which one species benefits and the other is neither helped nor harmed (+/0).
Population dynamics
Changes in the size of a population over time, caused by changes in birth, death, immigration and emigration rates; competition, predation and symbioses can drive these changes.
Students often think Competition means one species attacking, eating or harming another, so any interaction in which a species is harmed is competition. In fact No. Competition is an interaction in which two populations use the same limited resource, so that each reduces the other (−/−). When one species benefits by harming or eating the other (+/−), the interaction is predation or parasitism.
Students often think Organisms and populations change in order to meet a need, or act to help other species or the community survive. In fact No. Changes in organisms and populations result from mechanisms such as changes in birth and death rates, behavior that benefits the individual, or natural selection. Organisms do not change because they need to, and species do not act for the benefit of other species.
7 more questions. Every wrong answer here is a real mistake students make, and you see why it is wrong as soon as you answer.
Question 1 of 7
Ecologists counted the individuals of each species in two meadow communities, P and Q, of the same area. The table shows the counts. Using Simpson's Diversity Index, Diversity Index = 1 − Σ(n/N)², which conclusion about the two communities is correct?
Answer and reasoning
AQ is more diverse, as its index is 0.85 and P's is 0.25. A student who stops after calculating Σ(n/N)² picks this. Σ(n/N)² is the probability that two individuals picked at random belong to the same species, so a large value means low diversity; the index is 1 − Σ(n/N)², 0.75 for P and 0.15 for Q.
BQ is more diverse; it has 5 species, whereas P has only 4. A student who thinks diversity is just the number of species picks this. Q has more species, but 92 of its 100 individuals belong to one species; Simpson's index, which also reflects how evenly individuals are spread among species, is 0.75 for P and 0.15 for Q.
CP and Q are equally diverse; each has 100 organisms. A student who thinks diversity depends on the number of individuals picks this. Both communities have 100 individuals, but diversity depends on the number of species and how evenly individuals are spread among them: 0.75 for P and 0.15 for Q.
DP is more diverse; its index is 0.75, and Q's is 0.15.Correct N = 100 in each community. For P, Σ(n/N)² = 4 × (0.25)² = 0.25, so the index is 1 − 0.25 = 0.75. For Q, Σ(n/N)² = (0.92)² + 4 × (0.02)² = 0.848, so the index is 1 − 0.848 = 0.15. Q has one more species, but 92 of its 100 individuals belong to species A, so it is far less diverse.
Working N = 100 in each community. P: n/N = 0.25 for each of species A–D (and 0 for E), so Σ(n/N)² = 4 × 0.0625 = 0.25 and Diversity Index = 1 − 0.25 = 0.75. Q: (92/100)² + 4 × (2/100)² = 0.8464 + 0.0016 = 0.848, so Diversity Index = 1 − 0.848 = 0.152 ≈ 0.15. P has the higher index, so P is more diverse. Distractors: stopping at Σ(n/N)² gives 0.25 for P and 0.85 for Q, reversing the conclusion; counting species alone favors Q (5 species versus 4); counting individuals gives 100 in each.
In a lake, bass eat minnows, minnows eat zooplankton, and zooplankton eat algae. Anglers remove nearly all of the bass. Which prediction about the algae is most likely correct?
Answer and reasoning
AAlgae would increase, as more minnows would eat more of the zooplankton that feed on algae.Correct This is a trophic cascade. With few bass, fewer minnows are eaten and the minnow population grows; more minnows eat more zooplankton, so zooplankton decline; with fewer zooplankton grazing, the algae increase. A change at the top of a food chain affects populations several links below it.
BAlgae would not change, as bass do not feed on algae and so do not affect them. A student who thinks a change affects only the populations directly linked to it picks this. The bass affect the algae indirectly, through the minnows and the zooplankton.
CAlgae would decrease, as the loss of any species harms every other species in the lake. A student who thinks the loss of any species harms all others picks this. Removing a predator benefits its prey (the minnows), and the effects alternate down the chain, so the algae increase.
DAlgae would increase at first, but all populations would then return to their original sizes. A student who thinks communities always return to their original balance picks this. With the bass gone, the minnows' main predator is missing, so the populations do not return to their former sizes; the community changes.
Two hypothetical species of insect-eating birds, A and B, live in a forest. The table shows the percentage of feeding time each species spends at three heights, in areas where it lives alone and in areas where both species live together. Which reasoning best explains the change in feeding heights where the two species live together?
Answer and reasoning
AEach species moves aside to leave food for the other, so that it helps the other species survive. A student who thinks organisms act to help other species picks this. Each species shifts toward heights where it meets less competition, which benefits that species itself; nothing in the data suggests that either gives way for the other's sake.
BEach bird's beak changed during its life so that it could catch the insects found at a new height. A student who thinks individuals change their bodies to meet a need picks this. The data show a change in where the birds feed, a change in behavior; an individual's beak does not change shape during its life because of where it needs to feed.
CSpecies A is being driven out of the forest, as competing species cannot live together for long. A student who thinks competing species cannot coexist picks this. Both species are present and feeding where they live together; by partitioning the forest they reduce competition, which can allow them to coexist.
DFeeding at different heights reduces competition for the same insects, so they can coexist.Correct Where each species lives alone, both feed mostly at middle heights (50%), so where they live together they would compete for the same insects. Where they live together, A feeds mostly high (70%) and B mostly low (65%), so their use of the forest overlaps much less. This niche partitioning reduces competition, which can allow the two species to coexist.
Populations of a hypothetical protist species X were grown in culture alone, with protist species Y, or with protist species Z, and every culture received the same amount of food. The graph shows the mean density of X after 14 days (n = 8 cultures per treatment); error bars represent ±2 SE of the mean. Which conclusion is best supported by the data?
Answer and reasoning
ABoth Y and Z reduced the population of X, although Y had a larger effect on it than Z. A student who treats any difference between means as real picks this. The mean with Z (198 cells/mL) is lower than alone (210 cells/mL), but the error bars overlap widely, so this difference could be due to chance.
BY reduced the population of X, but an effect of Z on X is not supported by the data.Correct The mean density of X was 210 cells/mL alone and 120 cells/mL with Y; the ±2 SE bars (196–224 and 104–136) do not overlap, so Y likely reduced X's population, as expected if the two compete for the limited food. With Z the mean was 198 cells/mL, but its bar (180–216) overlaps that of X alone, so an effect of Z is not shown.
CZ had no effect on the population of X, as the error bars for those two groups overlap. A student who thinks overlapping error bars prove there is no effect picks this. Overlap means an effect of Z has not been shown, not that Z has no effect; a small effect could be missed with 8 cultures.
DX held back its own growth when Y was present, so as to leave enough food for Y. A student who thinks organisms act to help other species picks this. X's population is lower with Y because the two share a limited food supply, so each X cell obtains less food; X does not limit its growth for Y's benefit.
Working No test statistic is calculated; the decision rests on the ±2 SE error bars. X alone: 210 cells/mL (bar 196–224). X with Y: 120 cells/mL (bar 104–136); the bars do not overlap (136 < 196), so the reduction is likely real. X with Z: 198 cells/mL (bar 180–216); the bar overlaps that of X alone (196–216), so the 12 cells/mL difference may be due to chance and an effect of Z is not supported. Overlap does not prove that Z has no effect.
The graph shows the population densities of a hypothetical prey species and its main predator over 20 years. The two populations are plotted on different vertical axes. Which statement is best supported by the data?
Answer and reasoning
APrey density falls steadily over the 20 years, as more and more of the prey are eaten. A student who thinks predators drive their prey toward extinction picks this. Prey density rises and falls in cycles, between about 15 and about 80 per km²; it recovers whenever predators become scarce.
BPredator density is higher than prey density at every point in the 20 years. A student who thinks predators are more numerous than their prey picks this. The populations are plotted on different axes: predator density never exceeds about 12 per km², while prey density reaches about 80 per km².
CEach peak in predator density is reached two years after a peak in prey density.Correct Prey density peaks at years 4 and 14, and predator density at years 6 and 16, two years later each time. As prey become abundant, more predators survive and reproduce; as predators increase, more prey are eaten and the prey population falls, followed by the predator population.
DPrey density rises without limit in each period when predator density is low. A student who thinks a population grows without limit when its predators are scarce picks this. Each rise in prey density levels off at about 80 per km² and then falls, as predation increases.
In nitrogen-poor soil, a hypothetical legume species obtains most of its nitrogen from bacteria living in nodules on its roots. The bacteria convert nitrogen gas (N₂) from the air into compounds the plant can use, and the plant supplies the bacteria with sugars. A soil treatment kills the bacteria but does not otherwise harm the plants. Which prediction about the legumes growing in this soil is most likely correct?
Answer and reasoning
AThey would grow as before, as their leaves can take in the nitrogen gas they need directly from the air. A student who thinks plants use nitrogen gas directly from the air picks this. Plants cannot use N₂; they take up nitrogen compounds, which here come from the bacteria.
BThey would soon begin to convert nitrogen gas themselves, as they need a new source of nitrogen. A student who thinks organisms acquire new abilities when they need them picks this. The plants do not gain the ability to convert N₂ because they need nitrogen; that ability belongs to the bacteria.
CThey would grow more, as they would no longer give up their sugars to the bacteria in their roots. A student who considers only the cost of an interaction picks this. The plants would keep the sugars they supplied, but they would lose their main source of nitrogen, which limits growth far more in nitrogen-poor soil.
DThey would grow less, as they could no longer obtain enough nitrogen to build proteins and nucleic acids.Correct Through their interaction with the bacteria, the legumes gain access to nitrogen they cannot obtain from nitrogen-poor soil, and the bacteria gain sugars. Without the bacteria, the plants lack the nitrogen needed to build proteins and nucleic acids, so they grow less.
A hypothetical species of deer was introduced to an island where it had not lived before. Over the following 20 years, the plant species the deer prefer to eat became less common, and plant species the deer avoid became more common. Which statement best explains this change in the plant community?
Answer and reasoning
ADeer grazing reduced the preferred species, freeing light and space for the species deer avoid.Correct Interactions between populations change communities over time. The deer eat the preferred species, reducing their populations; the species the deer avoid then face less competition for light, water and space, so their populations increase, and the species composition of the community changes.
BThe avoided species increased in order to replace the lost plants and keep the community in balance. A student who thinks communities act to stay in balance picks this. Populations do not increase in order to replace others; the avoided species increased because competition from the preferred species was reduced.
CThe rise of the avoided species is unrelated to the deer, which affect only the plants that they eat. A student who thinks a change affects only the populations directly linked to it picks this. The deer affect the avoided species indirectly, by reducing the populations of their competitors.
DPreferred plants developed bad tastes during their lives and passed these on to their offspring. A student who thinks traits acquired during an individual's life are inherited picks this. Offspring do not inherit changes that a plant develops during its life; the change in the community comes from changes in the sizes of different species' populations.
Compiled from the AP Biology Course and Exam Description (effective Fall 2025) and our question bank · Specialist review in progress. How these pages are made · Free, no account